These factors are part of why Chicago was one of just four U.S. (It has since ticked back up to 5.3 percent.) Almost one-quarter of households in the city of Chicago earned more than $100,000 a year in 2016, according to census data. In May, the unemployment rate for the Chicago metropolitan area sank to 4.1 percent, the lowest since the government started tracking it in 1976. The evidence is everywhere, from the gleaming office towers and condos going up alongside the river to the prosperous international companies such as Motorola Solutions, the whiskey giant Beam Suntory, and GE Healthcare that have relocated their headquarters to downtown. Like many of America’s biggest cities, Chicago has thrived in the globalized world-at least on a superficial level. The disconnect is why Andrew Diamond, the author of Chicago on the Make, has called Chicago “a combination of Manhattan smashed against Detroit.” In some prosperous cities, such as Chicago, where the number of wealthy census tracts has grown fourfold since 1970, people at the bottom are struggling as much as they always have, if not more-illustrating that it’s not just the white rural poor who are being left behind in today’s economy. But this neat division, rural versus urban, erases another part of the story of America’s changing economy: the pressure that those twin forces are exerting within cities, pulling some people up to the very top while pushing others to an unforgiving bottom. They’re moving to urban places.īehind this divergence lies a straightforward story: The twin forces of globalization and technological change are enriching a handful of big urban areas, while resources are drained from the heartland, leaving it often devoid of opportunity and prosperity. People with a college education are leaving rural areas. Rural areas are losing jobs urban ones are gaining them. Rural counties are poorer urban ones richer. CHICAGO-Americans hear a lot these days about the country’s urban-rural divide.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |